The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2 – Review
by Travis Leamons on November 18, 2012


starstarblankblank

Love story concludes in not-so-epic fashion

I get the impression that Stephenie Meyer must have been on a Final Destination horror binge when she was contemplating the thrilling epic confrontation that pits the Cullen kin and allies against the Volturi, a coven of vampires that enforce the laws of the vampire world. So they’re like our US Congress, but these are real bloodsuckers.

The execution of the battle sequence is nicely staged, until it leads to the audience having the rug pulled out from underneath them. In that moment any emotional attachment we had to any of the characters, even those who are on the periphery and whose names are mentioned once and soon forgotten (aside from Lee Pace as Garrett, proving to be the most alluring of the newly introduced characters), is gone. It reeks of desperation, as if Meyer was too attached to her characters to see them no harm. To steal a phrase from the YA-stylized Easy A, minus the Gothicism, she didn’t have the “lady balls” to follow through, say unlike J.K. Rowling who killed off one of her series’ important characters to the shock and surprise of readers and eventual viewers.

This discrepancy aside, Breaking Dawn Part Two is over. Fin. Terminou. El Final. No matter what language “The End” or “Finished” is written I can say that this interpretation of the Twilight series has come to a close. We still may have the cinematic adaptation of Meyer’s The Host (coming in 2013), but it’s okay to put a wooden stake in these characters. This bastardization of the vampire mythos is no longer.

If that reads like a condemnation of the series as a whole, then you are right. The phenomenon of the Twilight series is something I’ll never understand. First as a massively popular fantasy romance before becoming a box-office juggernaut, the Twilight series has become the sort of wish fulfillment for teens and soccer moms that need a little bloodsucking with their romantic trysts. Never mind the fact that the series seems to dispute the entire women’s lib movement. How so? Well, our central protagonist, Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart), forgoes a human life to live a life eternal with vampire Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson). She is determined to have a man in her life, be he cold, dead or sparkly – or all three. (So much for Miss Independent.) As much as I want to believe that they are a pair of star-crossed lovers, at least in the case of Romeo & Juliet they had the words of William Shakespeare to back up their case. Stephenie Meyer doesn’t have the same way with words.

If Breaking Dawn Part One felt like a cheap movie because of its non-conclusion, Breaking Dawn Part Two feels oddly with its pacing. Picking up where the first half left off, with Bella surviving her pregnancy by being turned into a vampire, the movie has a lighthearted touch, with moments of intentional and unintentional comedy. Like when Bella as a newly turned vampire makes werewolf Jacob (Taylor Lautner) her B— by kicking the crap out of him while Edward stands amused at the situation. After some familiarization with the characters, with Bella getting her bearings and learning that today’s vampires sleep on beds instead of in coffins, the narrative sputters along leading to a rousing false climax, before a conclusion with a vision of the future that seems to inherently celebrate pedophilia. Say what?

Without giving too much away, the Volturi are led to believe that Bella and Edward have a human infant that has been bitten and transformed into a vampire, which is a big no no according to the by-laws. While the problem could have been solved over a friendly chat with a Dark Shadows marathon playing in the background, Michael Sheen’s Aro and Dakota Fanning’s Jane and the rest of the nameless Volturi players make their way to Washington to confront the Cullen clan over this malfeasance.

This allows Sheen to overact big time as Aro and the film is better because of it. Sheen is one of those actors that understands the campiness of the Twilight series so he embraces it. He’s not at all frightening or intimidating. If anything he’s more feminine than Bella. I bet underneath that large robe of his Aro’s decked out in undergarments that would make J. Edgar Hoover and Dr. Frank-N-Furter high-five each other. Dakota Fanning is purely window-dressing in her role, limited to only uttering the single word “Pain” a few times.

Of the regulars, they go through the motions as per usual, but at least the actors are more comfortable in their roles. Kristen Stewart seems more alive as a vampire than she ever was as a human. Though it appears to be that newly-minted female vampires still have some PMS to work out before the cycle shuts down for good. The film also includes the necessary moments that will make women swoon (read: removal of shirts). But because this is PG-13 any passionate love scenes are neutered to close-ups, fast edits and no climax. Not even smoking a cigarette afterwards.

If you don’t get too caught up with the climatic battle, it can be a lot of fun. Lots of visceral carnage involving vampires that won’t be attending any hat conventions in the near future. We get vampire-on-vampire beatdowns and wolf-on-vampire action that is well choreographed and orchestrated by Bill Condon’s direction. But in the context of the film the outcome is so deflating that it seems to be a disservice to the series, not just the movie, overall.

Had the Twilight series not become best-selling novels, the films may have ended up on Syfy or been released direct-to-DVD. But because of its large fan base we have five thankless movies that seem to reinforce negative stereotypes about today’s youth. Don’t give me the argument that I have a stilted impression of the Twilight series as a whole. I’ve watched each film as an objective viewer, trying to keep my mind open to this change in vampire mythology and regression of womanhood. But, alas, I guess I just like my women strong-willed and lucid and vampires less sparkly.

Director: Bill Condon
Writer: Melissa Rosenberg, based on the novel ‘Breaking Dawn’ by Stephenie Meyer
Notable Cast: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, Peter Facinelli, Ashley Greene, Billy Burke, Mackenzie Foy, Michael Sheen, Dakota Fanning, Jackson Rathbone, Lee Pace



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,





Related Reviews Articles

more articles »

Supernatural Episode 8-22 Season Finale Review - Sacrifice

Murtz On The Scene: American Idol Finale Performance Show Live Review

Review: Age of Ultron #8 By Brian Bendis and Brandon Peterson

Revenge Episodes 2-21 & 2-22 Season Finale Review – “I’m Amanda Clarke”

Travis Leamons

view profile »
  • Pingback: ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 2′: A hater’s guide – Entertainment Weekly (blog) |

  • http://profiles.google.com/katetowery Kate Towery

    Hmm, it’s interesting that you present the Twilight franchise as anti-feminist and old fashioned, and yet make a PMS joke to explain a woman having emotions. Of course, even fans of the Twilight books and movies can admit that Stephenie Meyer isn’t going to be joining NOW anytime soon. I do think Breaking Dawn features women as the strength, but it’s a lot more clear in the novel.

    Meyer has said that she avoided the final battle at the end because it would have meant too many deaths on both sides, and that’s not how she wanted to end the novel. I thought the movie found a good way to balance out her vision and still give the audience the popcorn battle scenes they crave.

  • disqus_G8wsAkxAsb

    Are u saying you did not like the series? What a buzz kill…I love people who don’t like stuff but can not turn away or let those who do like stuff, like stuff…

  • Sophia

    This ending movie is so stupid. sad to agree, Well they should have a series now to fill in the missing scenes I longed for!

  • ian

    Twilight sucks! All of you out there that payed money for that crap are the main reason society is going down the tubes.

  • JAJ

    No. Had this story not been best selling novels, then films would have NOT been on the Sci Fi channel. Sci Fi doesnt spend any money on their movies. They have a $9.99 budget per film.
    Movies aren’t meant to be picked apart and torn down scene by scene. They are purely for entertainment. They take our minds off the rest of the world for a couple of hours. If you’re not a fan of the Twilight series, then why go? Why sit here and do a 10 paragraph review on movies you never liked to begin with? just don’t go. Argo, Skyfall and a couple of other great movies are in the theaters at the same time. go see one of those instead of posting a long drawn out review. honestly, no one really cares. They’ll go see it anyways. It has grossed over $340 million in domestic and international sales so far. I highly doubt all those folks are concerned with this review or any others for that matter.

    • http://www.facebook.com/travis.leamons Travis Leamons

      You seem to forget that movies are a form of art. And to have a blanket statement that movies are purely entertainment seems to discredit genres like documentaries which expound upon a particular subject (like the West Memphis Three in the Paradise Lost trilogy or the rampant cases of sexual abuse in the U.S. military as seen in The Invisible War).

      Going in to movies I always keep an open mind about a project. I was interested to see what filmmaker Bill Condon could do with the material. He is, after all, an award-winning filmmaker who made Dreamgirls and Gods & Monsters prior to signing on to direct Breaking Dawn.

      And if no one really cared, why would the studio go to the trouble to have press and public screenings? They could have easily not made it available for press outlets, just like all the Tyler Perry movies. There are people out there who have never read the Twilight books that may venture to see the films because they may like the actors involved or the subject of vampires or werewolves. If they are moviegoers that read reviews from a newspaper or certain entertainment sites it could help them decide whether or not if they want to fork over the money to see it in theaters.

      So yes, reviews, even those that may go against your own point of view, have importance.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jannholl Judy Johnson Holland

    JAJ • a few seconds ago

    No.
    Had this story not been best selling novels, these films would have NOT
    been on the Sci Fi channel. Sci Fi doesnt spend any money on their
    movies. They have a $9.99 budget per film.
    Movies aren’t meant to be
    picked apart and torn down scene by scene. They are purely for
    entertainment. They take our minds off the rest of the world for a
    couple of hours. If you’re not a fan of the Twilight series, then why
    go? Why sit here and do a 10 paragraph review on movies you never liked
    to begin with? Just don’t go. Argo, Skyfall and a couple of other
    great movies are in the theaters at the same time. go see one of those
    instead of posting a long drawn out review. honestly, no one really
    cares. They’ll go see it anyways. It has grossed over $340 million in
    domestic and international sales so far. I highly doubt all those folks
    are concerned with this review or any others for that matter.

  • Valkyrie

    Well said. It has always baffled me how a trite, poorly written book series (which calls itself a saga, showing even in the title that Meyer enjoys using words improperly) became popular enough to be turned into a trite, poorly acted series of movies. This story is supposed to be for entertainment? That would imply that I find the glorification of unhealthy co-dependency in romance entertaining. I don’t.

  • alex

    I understand what the Twilight book series is aiming for and sure there’s a market for that but as pieces of cinema these movies are crap! There horribly acted, look bad, badly paced, ridiculous dialogue and cheap crappy f/x. They’re shit movies. I can’t comment on the books as I’ve never read them but I agree Bella is a horrible role model for young women. She wines, acts boy crazy, irrational and is rewarded for choosing the “bad boy” over the “nice guy.”

  • pipi

    Todays youth? My other half is 44, i am 37, friends of ours are 36, 31, 30 and 35 and we all are twilight fans! So it shows how narrow minded you are to imply that the success of this film says something re Todays youth!

    • alex

      sure there’s a handful of older fans but the majority are teenage girls, that’s the fanbase they were going for

  • Camille

    “… with Bella getting her bearings and learning that today’s vampires sleep on beds instead of in coffins”

    Meyer’s vampires don’t sleep. They were implying the bed is for sex.

  • Twi-fan

    This reviewer clearly did not understand the movie, the nuances, the characters or their relationships. I HATE when novice reviewers try to understand what is a long-developed plot line. Why do so many of us get it, love these movies, and pay millions to see them/enjoy them–yet these newcomers jump in to tell us we are idiots and explain to us dimwits things like “vampires sleep in beds like humans?” Was he snoozing not to understand what was meant by this innuendo? Or perhaps he doesn’t get what a bed can be for at all–human or otherwise. So sad. And the “twist”of the post-battle scene conclusion is spectacular. Again this reviewer has clearly not read the books nor does he understand our relationship with the characters. Now if Stephanie Meyer wanted to draw this out, make more money and more movies–she might have been wise to let the battle scenes stand as it ended. Plenty of room for more movies in following up on the widowed characters. Instead she did EXACTLY what we wanted–though I doubt we even knew we did. It was shocking, painful, horrifying, devastating, relieving, exhilarating and awesome–in that order. I think the “twist” was positively genius to give all of us “Twi-fans” a jolt. I don’t understand how some of these people make a living doing this, when it appears that they leave for popcorn during a large part of the movie.

Recent Comments

Search Pulse

Author:

Zone:

Category:

Movie Reviews
Movie News
So, with this Simple Jquery Modal Window, it can be in any shapes you want! Simple and Easy to modify : )