The Weekend Hotline 6.21.03

Archive

Another Satuday, another column.

Work continues to kick my ass five ways to Sunday, and it’s really nice out today, so we’re going to roll with the quickness. However there is some stuff I have to mention about the whole thing with Kane, which I’ll do in the top story, but for now, let’s check in with the

Mailbag!

Daniel: Smackdown ratings up because of Billy Gunn ?

No … it’s because of Triple H’s flexing during the Bad Blood commercials. The man draws, he can’t help it

I stand corrected.

Stephen: I agree: Screw the rest of the world and their opinion of us. Americans spend too much time apologizing for themselves. Ever notice that all the people bitching about America generally live pretty well over here (Especially the whole state of California: Bastards don’t want anything to put a damper and their perfect little lives. Almost makes me ashamed to be a Democrat), or that the people that live the worst are among the most gung-ho patriotic?

Let the whiners and apologists spend some time living like an average citizen in any former Soviet states, or someplace in South America.
After seeing this run-down, beat-ass part of Moscow on a old Cops a few weeks back, my friends agreed: USA is A-OK. I’ll take a little animosity from other nations for little things like all this light and electricity in the house, hot water that reaches the second floor, etc

One of the odd dichotomies of our country. The people that live the best want to fix everyone else’s life, but at no personal cost to themselves. You can tax everyone else, just leave ME alone.

Ah well, on with the fun stuff

Top Story

So, it looks like either Kane’s mask is coming off or HHH is losing the title to him. Well, since we know one isn’t going to happen, we have to work under the assumption that Kane is losing his mask come Monday. (Since, of course, the WWF would NEVER pull at bait and switch and have Kane win by DQ, would they?)

The thing is, Kane losing his mask could be one of the best storylines the WWF has seen in a while. Why? Because it can be used to explain away ALL of the inconsistencies in the Kane character from Day 1. Once they reveal who he is, there are so many ways they can go with the story, and ALL of them lead to a good storyline.

With apologies to the rest of the news crew, who detest fantasy booking, sit with me for a moment, if you will and think about where this mask loss angle could go.

Kane takes the mask off to reveal he is the same guy who played Isaac Yankem and Fake Diesel. So what, it makes the WWF look dumb right?

Not necessarily. What happens if Jacobs reveals that he was never Kane, but that Paul Bearer never found the real Kane and needed to use someone to take out the Undertaker. Jacobs was there, he was big enough, and the Undertaker hadn’t seen Kane in years, so he had no idea how big he should be, how strong he should be, etc etc. After all the time of being stuck with sucky character after sucky character, Jacobs saw dollar signs in taking this guy’s life, so he took Paul Bearer up on the offer and put the mask on. That’s why he wears the mask in public, so no one found out who he really was. This explains away the magically healing arms, magically healing voice, and why his face isn’t burned.

The OTHER way they could go is to say that Jacobs was pissed that, after all the time he spent trying to get over, this burned FREAK came into the WWF and all the fans immediately loved him. So he could insinuate that he did SOMETHING to the real Kane and took his spot behind the mask. Had him committed maybe? The only problem with that is, then the fans will expect the real Kane to show up to take revenge.

But then, we have a ready made feud with the Undertaker, and the Undertaker is on Smackdown which means Jacobs and the Undertaker don’t even have to lay eyes on each other till Summerslam which would be their first confrontation. Undertaker wanting to know what happened to Kane, where he was, etc and a feud in which they would only see each other once every three months. Two confrontations at Summerslam and Survivor Series a meeting in the same ring at the Royal Rumble, and a huge blowoff feud come Wrestlemania. Talk about long term booking? Talk about building a feud for nine months? Can you imagine the people who would want to see this match by the time next March rolled around?

But this is one of those: giving the booking staff too much credit things. Either they’ll bail on the stipulation entirely (Kane wins by DQ, Kane doesn’t allow himself to be unmasked) or they’ll just pretend that Kane was never anyone else.

But, if it does happen, I’m sure Gewirtz will take credit for it.

Snoogans.

Vince Russo

Russo posted a column over at 1bob (fool, if he wanted it to reach an audience, he should have posted it with us) where he picked apart the writing of the WWE over the last few weeks. Say what you want about the guy, but at least he knows how to write a coherent storyline stupid twists and shock TV aside. He points out a bunch of problems.

Eric ran it in his column on Wednesday, and I just want to make sure that any of you who don’t read his do get a chance to see it. This is Vince Russo, talking about the WWE:

Even though it was the best thing for both the WWE and I to part our separate ways a year ago, I’d have to say that the high spot was that I didn’t have to sit through “Raw” and “Smackdown” anymore. As a television viewer, to put it bluntly, both shows were flat atrocious. I vowed to never watch another WWE show again unless new writers were hired. . .or I got paid to watch it.

Starting now. . .I get paid to watch it. So now the question: Why did I not only agree to critique Raw, but rather suggested it. . .the answer is two-fold. First and foremost–the money. I’m looking to get out of this ungrateful business in two years and retire to the mountains of Colorado . When I do I won’t be able to live on my lumberjack salary alone. Number 2—for the past eight years everything I have ever done, said or written has been critiqued by everyone who of course knows more than I do, so I figure that now it’s MY turn.

Before I start the bad review let me first say that I do realize that there are problems in my own backyard—NWA/TNA. Can the show be better? Yes. Is there some inconsistency? Yes. Holes in the storylines? Some. HOWEVER—there is a reason. Despite what you’d like to believe the “Almighty” Russo is not writing the show solo. I’m working with others who I have never worked with before on a creative level. There are some adjustments to be made; other philosophies to understand; growing pains. And, we’re working them out. So now I ask—what is the excuse of the WWE. The same writers who weren’t doing their job a year ago—are still not doing it today. Who do they know? What do they know? When they were writing “Friends”, which is some of their claims to fame, why wasn’t that show so LOUSY? Why can you write for, say Phoebe, and not Eric Bischoff? What is the difference? Bischoff is a good actor. Or, were you really writer’s on “Friends”, or just getting the coffee for the writers?

HMMM?

Here’s why the show’s so bad.

First of all, isn’t it copyright infringement to rip off “Evolution” from TNA? I could have swore that I said “Evolution is the Solution” on a pay-per-view only days before they came up with the familiarly close; “Evolution”. But never mind that—I don’t collect residuals for many of the things I contributed. OK—let’s start with Mick Foley. There is NOTHING to say negative about Mick. . . EVER. You just don’t do that. Mick can do no wrong. Yes, it’s true, Foley really IS God. But the trouble started when JR asked the question, “Are they (Evolution) going all the way down to the ring?” Where else were they going to go JR? But that’s nit-picky and I know it. But this isn’t—Randy Orton—who looks great and talks great—just shouldn’t use the words the writer’s give him. . .unless that is he wants to look stupid. Orton actually referred to Foley as a “loser”. What are six year-olds watching this show? Is that the best that the “Friends” writers can come up with. In that situation would one grown man refer to another grown man as a “loser”? Now that’s some ol’ time heat there. And, as if that wasn’t bad enough—then came the BAD FAKE WRESTLING. Mick got feed, after feed, after feed, with no member of Evolution ever trying to defend themselves. Again—say this was “real”–am I just going to run into a guy’s right hand again, and again, and again? It’s phony—unbelievable. IT NEEDS TO CHANGE. Then Triple H (nothing personal—everybody does it—it’s what they know) takes 5 straight shots in the face without ever once covering up. That to me is BAD wrestling. Over five years ago Vince used to pitch a bitch when Bret Hart would get hit in the corner again, and again, and never cover up—WHY IS IT STILL HAPPENING 5 PLUS YEARS LATER? Rethink your work guys. The more you just go through the motions the more fake it looks.

JR: “MY GOD!!!!!!!! MAE YOUNG’S GONNA WRESTLE!!! Again, am I supposed to get excited about this because I think JR is? Stop insulting my intelligence—I’m beggin’ ya!!!

Great to see the Dudley ‘s still giving 110% . But again—Nowinski got HOW MUCH of surgery done to his nose? Did you say $30,000, JR? OK, OK, I’ll stretch my imagination a little. However, you could probably CLONE the guy’s nose for less!!!

Kane/Van Dam promo? Now, I really haven’t watched “Raw” for about five years, so I have to ask: Did they ever explain why Kane can now speak normal English? I mean, he called Rob Van Dam a “DUDE”. Didn’t he used to have a voice box and the whole thing? Wasn’t he a monster badly burned in a fire a few years back? What happened? Forgetting all that, what this was was a really bad soap opera. I’m sorry—people just don’t talk like that in real life. They only talk like that if they’re part of a bad television show.

GREAT “Bad Blood” package. The WWE still does what the WWE does best—production. Even though many people don’t realize this—and never will—Executive Producer Kevin Dunn is just as valuable to that company as Vince is. Without Kevin that television product wouldn’t look the way it does.

AUSTIN ‘S “BORING” SEGMENT.

WOW—I really don’t get this one. You’re telling your entire audience that you’re putting a boring guy in a boring segment on primetime Monday Night. Why would I watch this if you’re already telling me it’s boring. Now, don’t get me wrong— Austin was great— Austin is Austin —but I question the whole cluster!@#$. Are you going to tell your audience that the show is boring in mid-October when the Bucs and the Eagles are tied 21-21 at the half? Vince would have NEVER allowed this five years ago. Did Rachel ever come out and tell Monica that this particular episode of Friends was BORING? WOW guys, you should be BitchSlapped for this one.

Then—to add insult to injury—the quick roll-up from behind? Let’s put a little bit more thought in the finishes—shall we?

GOLDBERG

All right, everybody knows he’s not one of my favorites, nor am I one of his—BUT—Bill Goldberg does not deserve to be “just another guy”—because he’s not. Let me explain myself—when I had the opportunity to work with Goldberg it was very difficult for me. I mean, how do you book a guy who had done so much—so fast. It was hard to know what to do with Goldberg because at WCW you just weren’t going to top what he already done. But what’s the excuse here? The guy was away for two years—and had never been in the WWE before. Why not make him that monster again? The fact is you have a whole new audience today than you did five years ago. Let Goldberg do what Goldberg does best. You can see signs of political BS, putting Goldberg in his place, yada-yada-yada, but what you’re doing is killing a guy that you can’t afford to kill right now.

PS—love him. Or hate him, NOBODY has the intensity that Goldberg STILL has.

ALSO—I love Jericho , but I’m beggin’ him to cover up before Booker’s chops REALLY do start to hurt.

I have to say this—Eric is a pro. To let Mae Young sit on your face? I just don’t know if I could allow that—work—or no work. Again, no love loss, but Eric is good. I again have to ask the question, “Is he being punished for being Eric Bischoff”? I have to hope not because right now the WWE can’t afford the games.

WOW—AGAIN!!! Who did Scott Steiner piss off to only get 5 seconds on the show and as a guest referee for a Mae Young match no less? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I DON’T CARE HOW BAD YOU SAY HIS WORK IS—IT’S SCOTT STEINER!!! And, knowing Scott—is he saying NOTHING behind the scenes?!!! Where’s the Scott I know and love? Does David Schwimmer get treated this way?!!!

ALSO—what’s stopping Steiner from leaving the ring to get to Test. Are the ropes electrified? Or, is it just “one of those rasslin’ things?

I liked Jackie Gayda and Rico. The characters were so over the top that I got it. What I don’t get is when they’re over the top and not supposed to be.

JR—”Test ran like a scalded dog.”

WOW.

And. . .six years later Lawler is still talking about puppies.

Maven & Orton. Both guys looked great in the ring. It was also great to see Mick and Flair out there helping the young guys—very refreshing to see. Lawler said that Mick’s book is on the “best smeller’s” list. Who is the WWE’s audience here? 10 year-olds? I love the King but unless your bedtime is 8 o’clock —your just not laughing at this !@#$%.

The highlight of the night—SOCKO!!!! SOCKO!!!! SOCKO!!!

Still over after all these years!!!

Oh, and in the finish of the match—GOD FORBID we have an upset. So far I have called the outcome of every match. Where’s the unpredictability?

Le Resistance? The gimmick worked 20 years ago—not today. In 2003—guys like these just don’t exist. It’s a joke. It insults my intelligence and doesn’t suspend my disbelief. I don’t believe. It’s juvenile. It’s stupid.

Next week– Kane unmasked!!!

WOW—we get to see Dr. Isaac Yankem again.

PLEASE!!!!!

Two matches were interrupted in the middle to go to break. In my five years of writing “Raw” that was NEVER done. Every segment had either a match, interview, or ga-ga. Is the creativity so low that you can’t come up with !@#$% to fill the show. What if I go to something else during the break that turns out to be better and I NEVER come back to the boring match? Again—five years ago Vince would have never allowed that, but today he does. WHY? That’s the million dollar question.

Man, that felt good. Now I understand why you guys do that to me every week. But, not only was it good. . .it was easy. Bottom line: Unless you’ve ever been in that spot you have no idea how difficult it is.

BUT. . .they still need to be better. . .much better.

The bigger story is that TNA, the organization, asked this to be pulled from 1wrestling which they obliged unfortunately, our man Matthew Michaels got a copy of it before it vanished and now it will reach a bigger audience than if it just stayed on 1bob. HAHAHA, FOOLS~!

What Russo is saying is right for the most part. Raw hasn’t changed or grown in the last five years, which is where their primary problem lies. Lawler is still running his mouth about the same shit, and throwing lame insults. JR carries that announce team and, say what you want, his interaction with Heyman was better than anything he’s done with Lawler in the last few months.

There is no excuse for a professional company to be as creatively bankrupt as they are, while having a wealth of talent in the ring and in the production team. Their creative staff is so totally out of touch that it’s embarrassing. If it wasn’t for the few really charismatic people on Raw, it would be a wasteland of a show, because no one there has any idea on how to keep people interested.

Newsbites

1. Brock Lesnar was injured in a boating accident this past week in Texas. He and some buddies went out in a boat and Lesnar fell off and had his leg sliced open by the propeller. The leg required a bunch of stitches to close up. Lesnar is expected to miss the Madison Square Garden Smackdown this week or, at the very least, not wrestle.

No word on how the boat was after receiving an F5 for it’s trouble. No word on how many beers it took Brock to fall off the boat.

2. Terry Funk is rumored to be on Raw this Monday to take place in some sort of ceremony to honor Mick Foley. Expect HHH to interject himself, because nothing on Raw can go off with him being a part of it.

3. Steve Corino was arrested on charges of forgery and fraud this past week when an ex-girlfriend claimed he forged a check and used her credit card 25 times. Corino proclaims his innocence on an official statement on his website. No word on when The Smoking Gun will have his mugshots online. They’re slacking with the Martha Stewart ones.

In Other Reading

Bower is up with Rant Wars Week 6. This week’s special guest is Joshua Grutman, who has a much different style of reaming people than Eric S. Read the start of the next great web-feud.

David Murphy shows us a conversation The other half. The half that doesn’t find the need to bitch about every show right after it’s put on.

Haley goes into The Little Things.

In Conclusion

Got a bowling banquet to get to, so I’m out for the week. Get to get my envelope o’ cash for second place. Free beer and grilled food for the next eight hours. I’m down with that.

See you all on Tuesday when, hopefully, I remember that I write a column on Tuesdays.